BrexitEstablishmentPoliticiansPolitics

Revocation may be the best thing for clean Brexiteers

I said yesterday that Parliamentary Remainers, despite their Supreme Court victory, still have limited options, one of which is to revoke Article 50 entirely. This would obviously be a terrible thing to happen, but in a way it may be the best thing for us clean Brexiteers. Because that would make it completely obvious to everyone that the Remain cause is not about giving people another say, or protections for the environment and workers, and so on. It’s about overturning the referendum and stopping Brexit, pure and simple.

It would also make it crystal clear what people like me have been saying for years, that the Establishment is a corrupt, bullying, anti-democratic, authoritarian, ideologically-deluded, puffed-up, preening, self-interested gang of self-appointed crooks who are actively working against the interests of the people and the country they are meant to serve. Before 2016 this sort of message was regarded by most as partisan exaggeration. Since then it’s become hard for even the smoothest Blairite to argue against. (Same with media bias: five years ago leftists would openly mock such claims, now it’s very hard to deny.)

So outright revocation would provide a strong reason for undertaking fundamental reform of the establishment (including the BBC), and even the perennially useless Conservatives would be forced to do something (though of course they’d do their best to fudge it). But it wouldn’t stop Brexit from happening, because pro-Brexit parties would sweep the board in the next election, and then we’ll just leave the EU immediately, no deals, no fudges, no extensions. So we’d ultimately get what we want on Brexit, and be able to do a lot of damage to the Establishment at the same time.

What I fear most is not revocation, but a deal, a watered-down version of May’s surrender document finally getting through Parliament, or some ridiculous concoction cooked-up by Labour and the LibDems. Because that will be hard to ever get rid of.

Social media

3 thoughts on “Revocation may be the best thing for clean Brexiteers

  1. For the life of me, I can’t understand why politicians and the media – and a fair few of our countrymen – see “any deal” as superior to “no deal”. It’d be akin to excising a cancerous tumour and leaving it connected by a thread of tissue – you get the pain, you take the risk of complications, but keep the risk of the cancer. And let’s face it, if there’s a metaphor for the EU, “a cancerous growth” is a pretty good one.

    I agree; a clean, completely unencumbered Brexit is the only desirable outcome here. That, we’ll survive. It might be rough; my pension fund might be toast for a while, but then we can move on while the EU falls in on itself.

    I’m even starting to have some confidence in Boris. I hope he doesn’t fold the game.

  2. >For the life of me, I can’t understand why politicians and the media – and a fair few of our countrymen – see “any deal” as superior to “no deal”.

    There are two reasons why they want a deal. The first is the ‘official’ one, that there will be chaos without one, and some Tories fear that they will be forever known as the party that unleashed a no deal disaster upon the country. (Labour is fine with chaos, because Marxists feel that they do well out it, but they want the Tories to take the blame for it.)

    The real reason, though, is that a ‘deal’ is key to preventing us from really leaving, and will set us up to be taken back in later on.

  3. The real reason, though, is that a ‘deal’ is key to preventing us from really leaving, and will set us up to be taken back in later on.

    It’s a fair cop, guv. Slowing down in my old age. Hadn’t thought of that one, I must admit, but it would certainly suit the way the Deep State seems to be working. Cheers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *